EMC
TEST REPORT
|
Responsible Party |
: |
SUPREME AQUA CO., LTD. |
|
Manufacturer |
: |
SUPREME AQUA CO., LTD. |
|
Description of
Product |
: |
AQUARIUM IC THERMOSTAT HEATER |
|
Trade Name |
: |
SUPREME AQUA |
|
Model No. |
: |
F.I.R |
|
Test Report File No. |
: |
ET88S-06-037 |
|
Date of Issue |
: |
SEP. 26, 2000 |
Test Performed by
ELECTRONICS TESTING
CENTER (ETC) , TAIWAN
NO. 8 LANE 29, WEN-MING RD., LO-SHAN TSUN,
KUI-SHAN HSIANG, TAOYUAN HSIEN, TAIWAN, R.O.C
TEL : (03)3276170~4 FAX : (03)3276188
This test report consists of 37
Pages. This test report is the property of ETC, and shall not be reproduced
except in full, without the written consent of ETC. ETC hereby returns all
rights-in-data to [SUPREME AQUA] for their exclusive legal use.
|
Note : |
1.
The results of the Test Report relate only to the items tested. |
|
|
2.
The Test Report shall not
be reproduced except in full , without the written approval of ETC. |
CONTENTS
l
EMC TEST
REPORT……………………………….…………………………………………....1
l
CONTENTS
………………………….……………………………………………….……..…..2
1 TEST REPORT CERTIFICATION................................................................................................... 4
2 GENERAL INFORMATIONS......................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Description of EUT:................................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Related Informations of EUT:..................................................................................................... 5
2.3 Tested Configuration:................................................................................................................. 5
2.4 Deviation Record:...................................................................................................................... 5
2.5 Modification Record:................................................................................................................. 5
3 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS.................................................................................................... 6
3.1 Emissions:.................................................................................................................................. 6
3.1.1 Conducted Emissions......................................................................................................... 6
3.1.2 Disturbance Power............................................................................................................ 6
3.1.3 Harmonics Current Emissions............................................................................................. 6
3.1.4 Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker......................................................................................... 6
3.2 Immunity:................................................................................................................................... 6
3.2.1 Immunity Criteria:.............................................................................................................. 6
3.2.2 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity:....................................................................................... 7
3.2.3 EFT/Burst Immunity:.......................................................................................................... 7
3.2.4 Surge Immunity:................................................................................................................. 7
3.2.5 RF Common Mode Immunity:............................................................................................ 7
3.2.6 Voltage Interruptions and Voltage Dips Immunity:................................................................ 7
4 TEST DATA & RELATED INFORMATIONS................................................................................. 8
4.1 Emissions:.................................................................................................................................. 8
4.1.1 Conducted Emissions Test :................................................................................................ 8
4.1.1.1 Conducted Emissions Test Data:............................................................................. 8
4.1.1.2 Conducted Emissions Test Setup Photos :............................................................. 13
4.1.2 Disturbance Power Test :................................................................................................. 14
4.1.2.1 Disturbance Power Test Data:............................................................................... 14
4.1.2.2 Disturbance Power Test Setup Photos :................................................................. 16
4.1.3 Harmonics Current Emissions Test :.................................................................................. 17
4.1.3.1 Harmonics Current Emissions Test Data:............................................................... 17
4.1.3.2 Harmonics Current Emissions Test Setup Photos :................................................. 19
4.1.4 Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Test :.............................................................................. 20
4.1.4.1 Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Test Data:............................................................ 20
4.1.4.2 Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Test Setup Photos :.............................................. 22
4.2 Immunity:................................................................................................................................. 23
4.2.1 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test :............................................................................. 23
4.2.1.1 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test Data:........................................................... 23
4.2.1.2 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test Setup Photos :............................................. 25
4.2.2 EFT/Burst Immunity Test :................................................................................................ 26
4.2.2.1 EFT/Burst Immunity Test Data:............................................................................. 26
4.2.2.2 EFT/Burst Immunity Test Setup Photos :............................................................... 27
4.2.3 Surge Immunity Test :....................................................................................................... 28
4.2.3.1 Surge Immunity Test Data:.................................................................................... 28
4.2.3.2 Surge Immunity Test Setup Photos :...................................................................... 29
4.2.4 RF Common Mode Immunity Test :................................................................................. 30
4.2.4.1 RF Common Mode Immunity Test Data:............................................................... 30
4.2.4.2 RF Common Mode Immunity Test Setup Photos :................................................. 31
4.2.5 Voltage Interruptions and Voltage Dips Immunity Test :..................................................... 32
4.2.5.1 Voltage Interruptions and Voltage Dips Immunity Test Data:................................... 32
4.2.5.2 Voltage Interruptions and Voltage Dips Immunity Test Setup Photos :..................... 33
5 CONSTRUCTION PHOTOS OF EUT......................................................................................... 34
|
Client |
: |
SUPREME
AQUA CO., LTD. |
|
|
Address |
: |
3F,
NO.241, TA-AN RD., SEC. 1, TAIPEI, TAIWAN, R.O.C. |
|
|
Manufacturer |
: |
SUPREME
AQUA CO., LTD. |
|
|
Address |
: |
3F,
NO.241, TA-AN RD., SEC. 1, TAIPEI, TAIWAN, R.O.C. |
|
|
EUT |
: |
AQUARIUM
IC THERMOSTAT HEATER |
|
|
Trade
name |
: |
SUPREME
AQUA |
|
|
Model
No. |
: |
F.I.R |
|
|
Comment issues |
: |
(1) The data also
apply to model: M.I.T. (2)
The multiple listing recognized without test basis is according
to information supplied by manufacturer. A detail documentation of the above
said model must be verified by legal right organization for the EMC
characteristic with relation to the subject model. |
|
|
Test
specifications |
: |
Emissions |
Immunity |
|
Regulations
applied |
: |
Emissions |
Immunity |
The testing described
in this report has been carried out to the best of our knowledge and ability, and our responsibility is limited to
the exercise of reasonable care. This certification is not intended to relieve
the sellers from their legal and/or contractual obligations.
|
Approved by |
: |
Joseph Lu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph Lu ,
Supervisor of EMC Dept. of ETC |
Laboratory
Introduction: Electronics Testing Centzer, Taiwan is recognized, filed and
mutual recognition arrangement as following:
Œ ISO9002 : BSMI, TüV Product
Service
ISO/IEC Guide25 : BSMI, CNLA,
DGT, NVLAP, CCIBLAC, UL, Compliance
Ž EN45001 : TüV Rheinland, NEMKO,
FIMKO, SGS
Filing : FCC, Industry Canada,
VCCI
MRA : Australia, Hong Kong, New
Zealand, Singapore, USA, Japan, Korea, China, APLAC through CNLA
Being used in
aquarium tank. You can set any temperature you need. It keeps the aquarium tank
at a constant temperature.
2.2
Related
Informations of EUT:
|
Size of EUT |
: |
300mm(W) ´ 30mm(H) ´ 30mm(D) |
|
Power Supply |
: |
230Vac, 50Hz, 300W |
|
Power Line |
: |
■ Nonshielded □ Shielded □ None , length: 1.8 m |
|
Single Line |
: |
□
Nonshielded □ Shielded ■ None , length: m |
|
Control Line |
: |
□ Nonshielded □ Shielded ■ None , length: m |
|
TEL. Line |
: |
□ Nonshielded □ Shielded ■ None , length: m |
|
Data Line |
|
□ Nonshielded □ Shielded ■ None , length: m |
* For more detailed features , please refer to User’s Manual.
The EUT was solely for testing and did not
connect to any devices.
Following
peripheral devices and interface cables were connected during the measurement:
|
Product |
Manufacturer |
Model No. |
Serial No. |
I/O Cable |
|
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
No deviations were required.
No modifications were required. (The conducted
emissions tested after running 10 min.)
3.1.1
Conducted Emissions
■
-PASS
|
Minimum EMI Margin to the limit: |
-10.8 |
dB |
at |
0.162 |
MHz |
3.1.2
Disturbance Power
■
-PASS
|
Minimum EMI Margin to the limit: |
-23.0 |
dB |
at |
30.120 |
MHz |
3.1.3
Harmonics Current
Emissions
■
-PASS
The harmonics current
values were under the limits of the class A equipment of the
EN 61000-3-2.
3.1.4
Voltage
Fluctuations and Flicker
■
-PASS
The voltage fluctuations
and flicker values were under the limits of the EN 61000-3-3
requirements.
The results of all of the
immunity tests performed on the EUT were evaluated according to the following
criteria, and according to the manufacturer’s specifications for the EUT:
Performance criterion A : The
EUT continued to operate as intended. No degradation of performance or loss of
function was allowed below a performance level specified by the manufacturer,
when the EUT was used as intended.
Performance criterion B : The
EUT continued to operate as intended after the test. No degradation of
performance or loss of function was allowed below a performance level specified
by the manufacturer, when the EUT was used as intended. During the test,
degradation of performance was however allowed. No change of actual operating
state or stored data was allowed.
Performance criterion C: Temporary
loss of function was allowed, provided the function was self recoverable or
could be restored by the operation of the controls.
3.2.2 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity:
Requirement
:Criterion B (or better)
|
■ - No Degradation of Function |
- Satisfies
Criterion A |
|
□ - Distortion
of Function |
- Satisfies
Criterion B |
|
□ - Error of
Function |
- Satisfies
Criterion C |
Requirement
:Criterion B (or better)
|
■
- No Degradation of Function |
- Satisfies
Criterion A |
|
□ - Distortion
of Function |
- Satisfies
Criterion B |
|
□ - Error of
Function |
- Satisfies
Criterion C |
Requirement
:Criterion B (or better)
|
■
- No Degradation of Function |
- Satisfies
Criterion A |
|
□ - Distortion
of Function |
- Satisfies
Criterion B |
|
□ - Error of
Function |
- Satisfies
Criterion C |
3.2.5 RF Common Mode Immunity:
Requirement
:Criterion A
|
■
- No Degradation of Function |
- Satisfies
Criterion A |
|
□ - Distortion
of Function |
- Satisfies
Criterion B |
|
□ - Error of
Function |
- Satisfies
Criterion C |
3.2.6 Voltage Interruptions and Voltage Dips Immunity:
Requirement
:Criterion C (or better)
|
□ - No
Degradation of Function |
- Satisfies
Criterion A |
|
■
- Distortion of Function |
- Satisfies
Criterion B |
|
□ - Error of
Function |
- Satisfies
Criterion C |
4
TEST DATA &
RELATED INFORMATIONS
4.1.1 Conducted Emissions Test :
4.1.1.1 Conducted Emissions Test Data:
A. Operating
Conditions of The EUT : Working Mode
Test Date : Aug. 08, 2000
|
Test Specification |
EN 55014-1:1993/A1:1997 |
|||
|
Test
Equipment |
Calibration Date |
Recommended
Recal. Date |
||
|
EMI test receiver\R&S\ESCS30 L.I.S.N.\Telemeter\NNB-4/32T |
Feb. 18,
2000 |
Feb. 17,
2001 |
||
|
Climatic Condition |
Ambient Temperature：
22。C |
Relative
Humidity： 60%RH |
||
|
Power Supply System |
AC
Power : 230 Vac 50 Hz |
|||
|
Test Set-up |
Table-top
Equipment |
|||
|
Freq. |
Meter Reading |
Factor |
Result |
Limit (dBuV) |
Margins |
|||||||
|
Q.P. Value |
AVG.
Value |
Q.P. Value |
AVG. Value |
Q.P. Value |
AVG. Value |
Q.P. or AVG. |
||||||
|
L1 |
L2 |
L1 |
L2 |
L1 |
L2 |
L1 |
L2 |
|||||
|
0.154 |
52.4# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
0.1 |
52.5# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
65.8 |
58.7 |
-13.3 |
|
0.162 |
*** |
54.5# |
---- |
---- |
0.1 |
*** |
54.6# |
---- |
---- |
65.4 |
58.2 |
-10.8 |
|
0.224 |
48.2# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
0.1 |
48.3# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
62.7 |
54.7 |
-14.4 |
|
0.235 |
*** |
30.4# |
---- |
---- |
0.1 |
*** |
30.5 # |
---- |
---- |
62.3 |
54.2 |
-31.8 |
|
0.361 |
*** |
32.4# |
---- |
---- |
0.1 |
*** |
32.5# |
---- |
---- |
58.7 |
49.5 |
-26.2 |
|
0.509 |
35.7# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
0.1 |
35.8# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
56.0 |
46.0 |
-20.2 |
|
0.548 |
*** |
34.4# |
---- |
---- |
0.1 |
*** |
34.5# |
---- |
---- |
56.0 |
46.0 |
-21.5 |
|
1.010 |
22.7# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
0.1 |
22.8# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
56.0 |
46.0 |
-33.2 |
|
1.041 |
*** |
27.2# |
---- |
---- |
0.2 |
*** |
27.4# |
---- |
---- |
56.0 |
46.0 |
-28.6 |
|
1.322 |
20.9# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
0.2 |
21.1# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
56.0 |
46.0 |
-34.9 |
|
1.388 |
*** |
23.4# |
---- |
---- |
0.2 |
*** |
23.6# |
---- |
---- |
56.0 |
46.0 |
-32.4 |
|
1.800 |
19.6# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
0.2 |
19.8# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
56.0 |
46.0 |
-36.2 |
|
2.020 |
*** |
21.7# |
---- |
---- |
0.2 |
*** |
21.9# |
---- |
---- |
56.0 |
46.0 |
-34.1 |
|
3.326 |
*** |
19.8# |
---- |
---- |
0.2 |
*** |
20.0# |
---- |
---- |
56.0 |
46.0 |
-36.0 |
|
3.463 |
21.7# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
0.2 |
21.9# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
56.0 |
46.0 |
-34.1 |
|
Freq. |
Meter Reading |
Factor |
Result |
Limit (dBuV) |
Margins |
|||||||
|
Q.P. Value |
AVG.
Value |
Q.P. Value |
AVG. Value |
Q.P. Value |
AVG. Value |
Q.P. or AVG. |
||||||
|
L1 |
L2 |
L1 |
L2 |
L1 |
L2 |
L1 |
L2 |
|||||
|
5.400 |
*** |
20.3# |
---- |
---- |
0.2 |
*** |
20.5# |
---- |
---- |
60.0 |
50.0 |
-39.5 |
|
5.611 |
19.6# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
0.2 |
19.8# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
60.0 |
50.0 |
-40.2 |
|
9.111 |
*** |
21.0# |
---- |
---- |
0.3 |
*** |
21.3# |
---- |
---- |
60.0 |
50.0 |
-38.7 |
|
9.259 |
19.4# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
0.3 |
19.7# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
60.0 |
50.0 |
-40.3 |
|
21.744 |
*** |
30.5# |
---- |
---- |
0.5 |
*** |
31.0# |
---- |
---- |
60.0 |
50.0 |
-29.0 |
|
21.931 |
28.9# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
0.5 |
29.4# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
60.0 |
50.0 |
-30.6 |
|
27.000 |
*** |
21.4# |
---- |
---- |
0.5 |
*** |
21.9# |
---- |
---- |
60.0 |
50.0 |
-38.1 |
|
27.537 |
22.2# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
0.5 |
22.7# |
*** |
---- |
---- |
60.0 |
50.0 |
-37.3 |
Notes: 1)
Place of measurement: EMC LAB. of the ETC
2) The EUT was placed
0.4m above reference ground plane.
3)
Example calculation : result for 0.154MHz: 52.4 + 0.1 = 52.5 dBμV
4)j If the data table appeared symbol of "***" means
the value was too low to be measured.
k If the data table appeared symbol of "----"
means the Q.P. value is under the limit for
AVG. so, the AVG. value doesn't need to be measured.
l If the data table appeared symbol of “#“ means the noise
was low, so record the peak
value.
|
Tested by |
: |
Rick Hu |
Checked by |
: |
Win
Po Tsai |
EN 55014-1 CLICK TEST DATA
Test Date : Jun. 19, 1999
|
Test Specification |
EN 55014-1:1993/A1:1997 |
|||
|
Test
Equipment |
Calibration Date |
Recommended
Recal. Date |
||
|
EMI test receiver\R&S\ESH3 Discontinuous Interference
Analyzer\CHASE\ DIA1512 |
Jan. 19,
2000 N.C.R. |
Jan. 18,
2001 N.C.R. |
||
|
Climatic Condition |
Ambient Temperature：
25。C |
Relative
Humidity： 65%RH |
||
|
Power Supply System |
AC
Power : 230 Vac 50 Hz |
|||
|
Test Set-up |
Table-top
Equipment |
|||
|
FREQUENCY (MHz) |
|||||||
|
0.15 |
0.50 |
1.40 |
30.00 |
||||
|
Meter Reading (dBμV) |
Meter Reading (dBμV) |
Meter Reading (dBμV) |
Meter Reading (dBμV) |
||||
|
ON |
OFF |
ON |
OFF |
ON |
OFF |
ON |
OFF |
|
75.4 |
77.1 |
68.2 |
71.8 |
58.5 |
57.6 |
36.8 |
34.7 |
|
73.2 |
75.9 |
67.6 |
67.1 |
61.6 |
59.2 |
35.8 |
46.0 |
|
83.6 |
70.9 |
67.2 |
66.1 |
52.4 |
61.5 |
38.8 |
48.0 |
|
75.7 |
78.7 |
64.2 |
65.8 |
57.4 |
61.5 |
41.2 |
44.8 |
|
71.8 |
80.4 |
71.2 |
70.3 |
58.8 |
66.0 |
46.5 |
46.2 |
LIMIT CALCULATION
total time of run (T) = 120
minutes
total number of counted clicks (nl) =9
N = 9/120= 0.075
Permitted limit is increased by the follow
formula :
|
44 dB |
|
(N < 0.2) |
|
20 Log10(30/N) |
|
(0.2 ≦ N ≦30) |
|
0 dB |
|
( N > 30) |
Permitted limit for 0.15 MHz = 66 +44 = 110
dBμV
Permitted limit for 0.50 MHz = 56 +44 = 100
dBμV
Permitted limit for 1.40 MHz = 56 +44 = 100
dBμV
Permitted limit for 30.0 MHz = 60 +44 = 104 dBμV
|
Tested by |
: |
Rick Hu |
Checked by |
: |
Win
Po Tsai |
4.1.1.2
Conducted
Emissions Test Setup Photos :
4.1.2 Disturbance Power Test :
4.1.2.1 Disturbance Power Test Data:
A. Operating
Conditions of The EUT : Working Mode-Power Port
Test
Date : Aug. 11, 2000
|
Test Specification |
EN 55014-1:1993/A1:1997 |
|||
|
Test
Equipment |
Calibration Date |
Recommended
Recal. Date |
||
|
EMI test receiver\R&S\ESCS30 |
Feb. 18,
2000 |
Feb. 17,
2001 |
||
|
Climatic Condition |
Ambient Temperature：
26。C |
Relative
Humidity： 52%RH |
||
|
Power Supply System |
AC
Power : 230 Vac 50 Hz |
|||
|
Test Set-up |
Table-top
Equipment |
|||
|
Freq. |
Factor |
Meter Reading |
Result |
Limit |
Margins |
|||
|
Q.P. Value |
AVG. Value |
Q.P. Value |
AVG. Value |
Q.P. Value |
AVG. Value |
Q.P. or AVG. |
||
|
30.120 |
3.4 |
17.7 |
---- |
21.1 |
---- |
45.0 |
35.0 |
-23.9 |
|
40.000 |
1.0 |
17.6 |
---- |
18.6 |
---- |
45.4 |
35.4 |
-26.8 |
|
60.000 |
0.5 |
19.0 |
---- |
19.5 |
---- |
46.1 |
36.1 |
-26.6 |
|
85.370 |
-0.2 |
18.8 |
---- |
18.6 |
---- |
47.1 |
37.1 |
-28.5 |
|
146.000 |
-1.6 |
20.2 |
---- |
18.6 |
---- |
49.3 |
39.3 |
-30.7 |
|
175.250 |
-1.9 |
20.3 |
---- |
18.4 |
---- |
50.4 |
40.4 |
-32.0 |
|
215.000 |
-2.5 |
19.8 |
---- |
17.3 |
---- |
51.9 |
41.9 |
-34.6 |
|
295.000 |
-3.1 |
19.7 |
---- |
16.6 |
---- |
54.8 |
44.8 |
-38.2 |
Notes: 1) Place of Measurement: Measuring
site of the ETC
2)
Measurement Equipment Used: Absorbing Clamp
3)j If the data table appeared symbol of "***" means
the value was too low to be measured.
k If the data table appeared symbol of "----"
means the Q.P. value is under the limit for
AVG. so, the AVG. value doesn't need to be measured.
l If the data table appeared symbol of “#“ means the noise
was low, so record the peak
value.
|
Tested by |
: |
Rick Hu |
Checked by |
: |
Win
Po Tsai |
B. Operating
Conditions of The EUT : Working Mode-Power Output Port
Test
Date : Aug. 11, 2000
|
Test Specification |
EN 55014-1:1993/A1:1997 |
|||
|
Test
Equipment |
Calibration Date |
Recommended
Recal. Date |
||
|
EMI test receiver\R&S\ESCS30 |
Feb. 18,
2000 |
Feb. 17,
2001 |
||
|
Climatic Condition |
Ambient Temperature：
26。C |
Relative
Humidity： 52%RH |
||
|
Power Supply System |
AC
Power : 230 Vac 50 Hz |
|||
|
Test Set-up |
Table-top
Equipment |
|||
|
Freq. |
Factor |
Meter Reading |
Result |
Limit |
Margins |
|||
|
Q.P. Value |
AVG. Value |
Q.P. Value |
AVG. Value |
Q.P. Value |
AVG. Value |
Q.P. or AVG. |
||
|
30.120 |
3.4 |
18.6 |
---- |
22.0 |
---- |
45.0 |
35.0 |
-23.0 |
|
40.180 |
1.0 |
17.4 |
---- |
18.4 |
---- |
45.4 |
35.4 |
-27.0 |
|
60.000 |
0.5 |
19.3 |
---- |
19.8 |
---- |
46.1 |
36.1 |
-26.3 |
|
85.400 |
-0.2 |
19.8 |
---- |
19.6 |
---- |
47.1 |
37.1 |
-27.5 |
|
145.120 |
-1.6 |
19.3 |
---- |
17.7 |
---- |
49.3 |
39.3 |
-31.6 |
|
175.400 |
-1.9 |
20.4 |
---- |
18.5 |
---- |
50.4 |
40.4 |
-31.9 |
|
215.000 |
-2.5 |
18.6 |
---- |
16.1 |
---- |
51.9 |
41.9 |
-35.8 |
|
295.000 |
-3.1 |
20.4 |
---- |
17.3 |
---- |
54.8 |
44.8 |
-37.5 |
Notes: 1) Place of Measurement: Measuring
site of the ETC
2)
Measurement Equipment Used: Absorbing Clamp
3)j If the data table appeared symbol of "***" means
the value was too low to be measured.
k If the data table appeared symbol of "----"
means the Q.P. value is under the limit for
AVG. so, the AVG. value doesn't need to be measured.
l If the data table appeared symbol of “#“ means the noise
was low, so record the peak
value.
|
Tested by |
: |
Rick Hu |
Checked by |
: |
Win
Po Tsai |
4.1.2.2
Disturbance
Power Test Setup Photos :
4.1.3 Harmonics Current Emissions Test :
4.1.3.1 Harmonics Current Emissions Test Data:
A. Operating
Conditions of The EUT : Set up 34。C Mode
Test
Date :Sep. 05, 2000
|
Test Specification |
EN 61000-3-2:1995/A1/A2:1998 |
|||
|
Test
Equipment |
Calibration Date |
Recommended
Recal. Date |
||
|
Power analyzer\XITRON\2503AHF |
Feb. 15,
2000 |
Feb. 14,
2001 |
||
|
Climatic Condition |
Ambient Temperature：
25。C |
Relative
Humidity： 65%RH |
||
|
Power Supply System |
AC
Power : 230 Vac 50 Hz |
|||
|
Test Set-up |
Table-top
Equipment |
|||
|
Test data see the next pages. |
|
Tested by |
: |
Ken |
Checked by |
: |
Jonson
Li |
4.1.3.2
Harmonics
Current Emissions Test Setup Photos :
4.1.4 Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Test :
4.1.4.1 Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker Test Data:
Test
Date : Sep. 07,2000
|
Test Specification |
EN 61000-3-3:1995 |
|||
|
Test
Equipment |
Calibration Date |
Recommended
Recal. Date |
||
|
Power analyzer\XITRON\2503AHF |
Feb. 15,
2000 |
Feb. 14,
2001 |
||
|
Climatic Condition |
Ambient Temperature：
25。C |
Relative
Humidity： 65%RH |
||
|
Power Supply System |
AC
Power : 230 Vac 50 Hz |
|||
|
Test Set-up |
Table-top
Equipment |
|||
A. Operating
Conditions of The EUT : Set up 34。C Mode
|
|
Test Data |
Limit |
Pass or Fail |
|
Plt |
0.42 |
1.00 |
Pass |
|
Pst |
0.51 |
1.00 |
Pass |
|
dt |
2.39 % |
3.0 % |
Pass |
|
dmax |
2.42 % |
4.0 % |
Pass |
|
dc |
0.55 % |
3.0 % |
Pass |
|
Tested by |
: |
Ken |
Checked by |
: |
Jonson
Li |
4.1.4.2
Voltage Fluctuations
and Flicker Test Setup Photos :
4.2.1 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test :
4.2.1.1 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test Data:
A. Operating
Conditions of The EUT : Set up 34。C Mode
Test
Date : Sep. 07, 2000
|
Test Specification |
IEC 61000-4-2:1995/A1:1998 |
|||
|
Test
Equipment |
Calibration Date |
Recommended
Recal. Date |
||
|
ESD simulator\KeyTek\MZ-15/EC |
May 15, 2000 |
May 14, 2001 |
||
|
Climatic Condition |
Ambient Temperature：
26。C |
Relative
Humidity： 56%RH |
||
|
Atmospheric Pressure : 986 mbar |
|
|||
|
Power Supply System |
AC
Power : 230 Vac 50 Hz |
|||
|
Test Set-up |
Table-top
Equipment |
|||
|
Energy-Storage
Capacitor |
： 150 pF |
Discharge
Resistor |
： 330 W |
Discharge
Times |
： 10 |
times/each condition |
|||||||||||||||
|
\ Discharge Mode |
Contact
Discharge
|
Air Discharge
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
\ESD Voltage |
2 kV |
4 kV |
kV |
kV |
2 kV |
4 kV |
8 kV |
kV |
|||||||||||||
|
\Points\Result\Polarity |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
|||||
|
1~7 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
-- |
-- |
|||||
|
HCP |
N |
N |
N |
N |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|||||
|
VCP |
N |
N |
N |
N |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|||||
Note : “ N ” means the EUT function was correct
during the test .
“
-- ” means the test could not be carried out.
|
Tested by |
: |
Ken |
Checked by |
: |
Jonson
Li |
TEST POINTS
4.2.1.2 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test Setup
Photos :
4.2.2 EFT/Burst Immunity Test :
4.2.2.1 EFT/Burst Immunity Test Data:
A. Operating
Conditions of The EUT : Set up 34。C Mode
Test
Date : Sep. 07, 2000
|
Test Specification |
IEC 61000-4-4:1995 |
|||
|
Test
Equipment |
Calibration Date |
Recommended
Recal. Date |
||
|
EFT/Burst Generator \Noiseken\FNS-AXIIB50 |
Oct. 04,
1999 |
Oct. 03,
2000 |
||
|
Climatic Condition |
Ambient Temperature：
26。C |
Relative
Humidity： 62%RH |
||
|
Atmospheric Pressure : 986 mbar |
|
|||
|
Power Supply System |
AC
Power : 230 Vac 50 Hz |
|||
|
Test Set-up |
Table-top
Equipment |
|||
|
Pulse : 5 /50ns Burst : 15ms /300ms |
Repetition
Rate : 2.5kHz above 2.0kV |
Test
time : 2 min/each condition |
|||
|
\Voltage\Polarity\ \Test
Point\Mode\Result\ |
1 kV |
||||
|
+ |
|
||||
|
Power Line |
L |
N |
N |
||
|
N |
N |
N |
|||
|
L - N |
N |
N |
|||
|
PE |
N |
N |
|||
|
L - PE |
N |
N |
|||
|
N - PE |
N |
N |
|||
|
LN-PE |
N |
N |
|||
Note : “ N ” means the EUT function was correct
during the test .
|
Tested by |
: |
Ken |
Checked by |
: |
Jonson
Li |
4.2.2.2
EFT/Burst
Immunity Test Setup Photos :
(Power Port)
4.2.3.1 Surge Immunity Test Data:
A. Operating
Conditions of The EUT : Set up 34。C Mode
Test
Date : Sep. 07, 2000
|
Test Specification |
IEC 61000-4-5:1995 |
|||
|
Test
Equipment |
Calibration Date |
Recommended
Recal. Date |
||
|
Lighting Surge Simulator \ Noiseken
LSS-15AX |
Jan. 10,
2000 |
Jan. 09,
2001 |
||
|
Climatic Condition |
Ambient Temperature：
26。C |
Relative
Humidity： 62%RH |
||
|
Atmospheric Pressure : 986 mbar |
|
|||
|
Power Supply System |
AC
Power : 230 Vac 50 Hz |
|||
|
Test Set-up |
Table-top
Equipment |
|||
|
Waveform : 1.2/50ms(8/20ms) |
Repetition rate : 60 sec |
Times : 1 time/each condition |
||||||
|
\Phase \Voltage \Mode \Polarity \Result |
0。 |
90。 |
180。 |
270。 |
360。 |
|||
|
1 kV |
L - N |
+ |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
|
|
- |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
|||
Note : “ N ” means the EUT function was correct
during the test .
|
Tested by |
: |
Ken |
Checked by |
: |
Jonson
Li |
4.2.3.2 Surge Immunity Test Setup Photos :
4.2.4 RF Common Mode Immunity Test :
4.2.4.1 RF Common Mode Immunity Test Data:
A. Operating
Conditions of The EUT : Set up 34。C Mode
Test
Date : Sep. 07, 2000
|
Test Specification |
IEC 61000-4-6:1996 |
|||
|
Test
Equipment |
Calibration Date |
Recommended
Recal. Date |
||
|
Signal Generator \ MARCONI \ 2030 Wideband RF Power Amplifier \ KALMUS \ 225LC RF Voltmeter \ Boonton \ 9200B Controller \HP\ Vectra VL24/33 RF Switch \COMTEST \RF-6 Direction Coupler \AR \ DC2500 -6dB Attenuator \RADIALL\R415706 CDN \ FCC \ FCC-801-M2-25 |
Oct. 08,1999 Jan. 23,2000 Oct. 22,1999 N.C.R. N.C.R. N.C.R. N.C.R. Nov. 15,1999 |
Oct.
07,2000 Jan.
24,2001 Oct.
10,2000 N.C.R.
N.C.R. N.C.R. N.C.R. Nov.
14, 2000 |
||
|
Climatic Condition |
Ambient Temperature：
26。C |
Relative
Humidity： 62%RH |
||
|
Power Supply System |
AC
Power : 230 Vac 50 Hz |
|||
|
Test Set-up |
Table-top
Equipment |
|||
|
Frequency
Range |
：0.15
MHz ~ 230 MHz |
Field
Strength |
：3 V |
Modulation (AM 1kHz 80%) |
|||||
|
Sweep
Rate |
：£ 1.5×10-3 decades/s |
Step Size |
：£ 1 % of preceding frequency value |
Dwell Time |
：2.9 s |
||||
|
Frequency
Range (MHz) |
Tested Line |
Test Result |
|||||||
|
0.15~230 |
Power Line |
N |
|||||||
Note : “ N ” means the EUT function was correct
during the test .
|
Tested by |
: |
Ken |
Checked by |
: |
Jonson
Li |
4.2.4.2 RF Common Mode Immunity Test Setup Photos :
4.2.5
Voltage Interruptions
and Voltage Dips Immunity Test :
4.2.5.1 Voltage Interruptions and Voltage Dips Immunity
Test Data:
A. Operating
Conditions of The EUT : Set up 34。C Mode
Test
Date : Sep. 07, 2000
|
Test Specification |
IEC 61000-4-11:1994 |
|||
|
Test
Equipment |
Calibration Date |
Recommended
Recal. Date |
||
|
Mains interference simulator/Haefely/PLINE 1610 |
Jan. 28, 2000 |
Jan. 27, 2001 |
||
|
Climatic Condition |
Ambient Temperature：
26。C |
Relative
Humidity： 62%RH |
||
|
Atmospheric Pressure : 986 mbar |
|
|||
|
Power Supply System |
AC
Power : 230 Vac 50 Hz |
|||
|
Test Set-up |
Table-top
Equipment |
|||
|
Test mode |
Voltage dips |
Durations(ms) |
Interval(s) |
Times |
Phase |
Result |
|
Voltage interruptions |
100% |
10 |
10 |
12 |
0。/ 180。 |
* |
|
Voltage dips in %UT |
60% |
200 |
10 |
12 |
0。/ 180。 |
* |
|
30% |
1000 |
10 |
12 |
0。/ 180。 |
* |
Note : “ * ” means the LED of EUT slightly
flickered during the test which was self-recoverable.
|
Tested by |
: |
Ken |
Checked by |
: |
Jonson
Li |
4.2.5.2 Voltage Interruptions and Voltage Dips Immunity
Test Setup Photos :
1. Front View of EUT
2. Inside 1 of EUT
3. Inside 2 of EUT
4. Front View of PCB NO.1
5. Rear View of PCB NO.1
6. Front View of PCB NO.2
7. Rear View of PCB NO.2
